10 Comments

Ivermectin?

What purpose does taking ivermectin have? Is this drug recommended by Dr. Joe?

Thanks 🙏

Expand full comment

Ivermectin is anti-parasitic, anti-viral and anti-inflammatory. Its use was suppressed along with HCQ in 2020 and 2021 so as not to undermine the vaccine agenda despite being safe and effective for early treatment of COVID when used with zinc to block viral intra-cellular replication. While Joe Dispenza does make sarcastic remarks about vaccines and drugs, he has not specifically mentioned ivermectin. https://larryburk.substack.com/p/lethal-lying-a-tale-of-two-saboteurs

Expand full comment

Thank you Dr. Burk. Are you familiar with Dr. Andrew Kauffman?

By the way. Thank you very much for sharing your experiences with Dr. Joe.

Expand full comment

Yes, I've listened to him speak with Tom Cowan a few times, and I'm a follower of Weston Price principles. That said, it is polarizing to make germ vs terrain theory an either/or conversation, as I think it may be more of a both/and situation. The concept of exosomes is interesting, but may not be the whole story. Saying that viruses do not exist is a discussion terminator which may turn off undecided truth seekers. Best not to be dogmatic about anything these days and keep an open dialogue going. Here is a counterpoint from Meryl Nass. https://www.technocracy.news/dr-meryl-nass-debunks-sars-cov-2-virus-isnt-real-never-been-isolated-myths/

Expand full comment

I understand abandoning germ theory is a “bridge too far” for some. That’s not my point, although I’m surprised you’re using the term dogma when defending germ theory. (When will the germ theorists debate or accept the challenge?)

Dr. Kauffman offers alternative therapies here:

https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/videos/ivermectin-the-true-story-by-dr-andrew-kaufman/

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, I agree with Dr. Nass in her opinion of Dr. Kauffman that he is "wrong and ignorant" as she is a reputable biowarfare researcher and courageous health freedom advocate while he is a psychiatrist with no credibility in treating or researching infectious disease. The only point I agree with in his tedious half hour "true story" of ivermectin is that toxicity is an overlooked issue. He spouts dogma without providing any proof whatsoever. Tom Cowan I have more respect for, but he also loves to take contrarian positions on just about every controversial health topic.

Expand full comment

Thanks for letting me know how you feel. There are things we don’t have in common, like I didn’t go to medical school and you did, although I’ve studied anatomy, physiology and pathology for more than 20 years, including more than 300 hours in the cadaver lab and I’ve read extensively, including Dr. Suzanne Humphries who you might agree with. She has researched the history of contagious disease and viruses and although she shows how the introduction of vaccines do NOT explain the disappearance of polio, measles, etc. , she continues to believe in viruses. Me thinks humans are neuroplastic and it can be for the better and worse.

For a long time I was convinced the sugar cube I got when I was six in 1957 to prevent polio were effective. After all, I stood in line after church to be given the dose from a tall man in a white lab coat and it was a ritual that made a deep impression. 64 years later I learned the truth. Virology is a hoax.

Expand full comment